How to Choose a Lawyer From a TV Commercial
Fact: You’ve been involved in an accident and are now sitting at home recuperating. You turn on the TV to watch mind-numbing daytime television (apologies to all those who do this on a regular basis) and notice that there is a lawyer commercial after every single TV break. You finally realize that you need an attorney to help solve your legal problems that were caused by your accident. But each lawyer ad that you see says pretty much the same thing. How do you decide which law firm is right for you just by watching these 30 second lawyer commercials?
The bottom line is that you can’t and here’s why:
Most lawyer commercials are 30 seconds long. In those 30 seconds, they don’t have the ability to explain to you how they can help solve your legal problem. An attorney’s goal in creating a 30 second message is basically to catch your attention so that you might pick up the phone and call them immediately after watching the commercial. Practically every personal-injury commercial gives you the same information. Ask yourself whether these overly-used common phrases help you distinguish one lawyer from another when watching these television commercials:
‘Injured?’
‘Been in an accident?’
‘We can help’
“Over 60 years combined experience’
‘You may be entitled to a cash award’
‘We fight for you’
‘The insurance companies are afraid of us’
‘We know the judges’
‘Call me now’
If you watch any daytime TV, these phrases should be so ingrained in your head that they are all mind-numbingly useless. None of this information helps distinguish one lawyer from another. If every lawyer is shouting out the same message, how do you, as a consumer, use that information to make an educated decision about which lawyer is really the right one for you?
Unfortunately, in those 30 seconds lawyers do not have the ability to explain to you how they can help solve your legal problem. Those truncated commercials don’t give you free reports that explain what they can do for you and what they have done in the past. Those commercials do nothing more than shout at you and tell you to call them. Importantly, they never explain why you should pick up the phone to call them.
The next time you see a lawyer commercial, and ask yourself why you should call that attorney. Does that lawyer answer the question of why they are the right lawyer for you? 99.9% of the commercials don’t answer that key question. They may be the right lawyer for you. Then again, they might not.
Your goal as an injured victim searching for an attorney is to become as educated as possible to determine which lawyer is the right one for you. Only by becoming educated will you be able to make proper decisions about which lawyer to hire. I will tell you that I have been a practicing lawyer for over 21 years handling accidents and medical malpractice cases here in the state of New York. I study lawyer commercials and lawyer advertisements, and I find it difficult, if not impossible, to answer the question of why one particular law firm should be called simply based upon their 30 second television commercial. If you can find a compelling reason to call one law firm over another based solely on their television commercial, then I congratulate you.
A Client on a mission of Truth
Contact Us
Top News Stories
-
First blog post - This is the excerpt for your very first post.
-
Patent Translation Services - *Application under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT)* The PCT is an international agreement between 117 countries to provide an easier patent filling ...
-
How to Use Google to Search For Government Court Record Databases - If you’re looking to search for court records then there are a number of ways you can go about it. Some can be time-consuming, while other ways will get...
-
Harmful Anesthesia Errors - Patients undergoing surgery are administered anesthesia so that they are unconscious during their procedures. Without anesthesia, surgery would be impos...
-
When an Employer Refuses to Compensate For on Call Time - There are a number of ways in which employers can try to get around paying their employees what the employees are legally entitled to by suggesting that...
-
Intellectual Property and the Economics of Entertainment - There’s been buzz over the past few weeks concerning how Cond Nast, the New York Times, and other publishing companies are busily preparing digital vers...
-
Estate Planning and the Forgotten Right to Recapture Copyrights - If your client’s estate plan overlooks the right to terminate contracts and recapture copyrights, it could cost your client’s heirs significant future i...
-
All About OPM Lawyers and Federal Disability Retirement - we can’t support but give utmost prominence and importance to our occupation which is our source of income. But there are situations that can lead us to...
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- United States
- Los Angeles
- Chinatown
- Marriage
- Pianist
- Rosemary's Baby
- Infidelity
- Relationships
- Switzerland
- Anna Nicole Smith
- Associated Press
- Barack Obama
- Business
- Extramarital Affairs
- Howard K. Stern
- Larry Birkhead
- Lawyer
- Mobile phone
- New York
- Soupy Sales
- U.S
- U.S. Office of International Affairs
- Academy Award
- Actor
- Adolf Hitler
- Africa
- Alex Karev
- All That You Can't Leave Behind
- Aobo Mac Keylogger
- Aobo Mac OS X Keylogger
- Apple
- Arizona Robbins
- Arts
- Auction
- Australia
- Barack Obama "Hope" poster
- Bart Simpson
- Bill Clinton
- Callie Torres
- Cedars Sinai Medical Center
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
- Celebrity
- CellPhones
- Cerebral palsy
- Chicago
- Chicago Tribune
- Chris Rock
- Christmas
- Cinema of Nigeria
- Communication
- Concert
- Dannielynn Birkhead paternity case
- Dave
- David Letterman
- Death of Michael Jackson
- District attorney
- Elvis Presley
- Eric Dane
- Fair Use Project
- Fan club
- Film industry
- Financial Lives
- Frank Sinatra
- Fraud
- George Clooney
- George O'Malley
- Grey's Anatomy
- How to Dismantle an Atomic Bomb
- Human
- Identity theft
- Illegal drug trade
- Izzie Stevens
- Jess Walter
- Jim Henson
- Jimmy Carter
- John Edwards
- Journalism
- Julie Kavner
- Katherine Heigl
- Kenny Ortega
- Ku Klux Klan
- Larry Mullen
- Late Show
- Law
- Lisa Simpson
- London
- Mac Monitoring
- Mac OS
- Mac OS X
- Maggie Simpson
- Malcolm-Jamal Warner
- Mannie Garcia
- Marge Simpson
- Matt Groening
- Matthew Prior
- Melbourne
- Michael Jackson
- Nathalie Maullin
- Niger Delta
- Nigeria
- No Line On The Horizon
- Nobel Peace Prize
- O2 Arena
- Online Writing
- Operating system
- Paul Reubens
- Pee-Wee Herman
- Perfume
- Pez
- Pieing
- Poetry
- President Obama
- Product placement
- Regina Lasko
- Renee Rose
- Richard Pryor
- Robert Englund
- Science and Technology
- Sexual intercourse
- Shepard Fairey
- Short subject
- Simpsons
- Snow Leopard
- Sound effect
- Stanford University
- Subscriber Identity Module
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Text messaging
- The Daily Telegraph
- The Jerk
- U.S. Department of Justice
- U2
- Veronica Lario
- Vertigo 2005: Live from Chicago
- Washington
- Way You Make Me Feel
- White Fang
- With Soupy Sales
- World War II
- Wynton Marsalis
- YouTube
- greys anatomy
0 comments:
Post a Comment